Value Investing Lessons From Reality TV (Seriously!)

I just penned an educational/informative article on my Forbes Column, “Value Investing Lessons From Reality TV (Seriously!)“, wherein I discuss some of the most important value concepts like always having a Margin of Safety (as described by Baupost Group’s Seth Klarman in his book by the same name), whether you’re bidding on abandoned storage units, stocks, or any other asset.

I also discuss some of the most common mistakes investors make; abandoning their discipline, chasing returns, following the herd, overconfidence, etc.  I humbly suggest giving it a read, whether you’re a novice or seasoned professional.

NFPreview Charts

Updated a few of my favorite domestic employment charts to help everyone prepare for NFP tomorrow.

The best indicator ADP vs. NFP.

NFP vs. inverted 4wma initial claims

One of my favorites: initial claims in in green, continuing claims in red, unemployment rate in blue

52 week moving average of non-seasonally adjusted initial claims

Next on the Blame Game: Student Loans.

In an email to its clients, Dominion Bond Rating Service (DBRS) proclaims “STUDENT LOAN DEBT WEIGHS ON U.S. ECONOMIC RECOVERY”. Student Loans will prevent a generation of potential home borrowers from every qualifying for a loan. According to the CFPB and the Federal Reserve Board, Americans have over $1trillion worth of student loan debt and this figure keeps increasing while other debts (credit card and autos) have decreased dramatically. The only debt greater than student loans is mortgage loans. Well, as we used to say on the floor, “Duh!”

This very severe and extended recession kept students in school longer and caused unskilled workers to go to school to improve their earning potential. In both cases, these students took out sizable student loans. As they finished their degrees, the recession hadn’t abated and they were left without jobs or prospect of jobs. Yes many looking took non-economically viable degrees like art history or islamic architecture but the job market hasn’t recovered like in past recessions. Even students from prestigious institutions are looking for good jobs or have been forced to take lower paying jobs (Do you want fries with your burger?).

A student loan is one of the very few debts that aren’t written off by bankruptcy. In 2005, President Bush signed into law the bankruptcy reform act which allowed private student loan originators to have a higher priority in bankruptcy than almost any other debt, with the possible exception of federal tax liens. Only in death does student loans have a priority of unsecured debt. While other debt is charged off or forgiven, student loans can live on forever. Many Democratic politicians have introduced legislation to place student loans at the same level as other unsecured debt like credit cards or forgiveness due to hardship. The GOP on the other hand want students to take responsibility for their debts no matter what and therefore won’t agree to a change in the law. Don’t expect this law to change any time soon.

Student loans are not a drag on the economy at the moment but will have a minor but noticeable effect as consumers de-lever all other forms of debt as this is a problem of the young and/or the unskilled. Many of these people will never truly be able to get rid of this debt and therefore never be able to get the level of credit available to those gainfully employed with degrees prior to the recession. Cheery scenario, no?

DBRS is out proclaiming the death of the US housing recovery due to student loans. They write:

“Some of the items precluding them from being approved for a mortgage may include larger down payments, the potential lack of an established credit history, and the disinclination by lender’s to consider a limited employment history which has resulted in many student borrowers renting or moving back home. Furthermore, certain graduates may also opt to continue with graduate level studies which may add more student loan debt and push buying a new home much further into the future.”

While many of these students maybe locked out of prime credit for years, DBRS makes the implicit assumption that subprime lending is dead forever. I disagree. Subprime mortgage lending will come back as the regulatory framework and risk pricing stabilizes. My crystal ball says four years from now. The other assumption DBRS makes is the lack of household formation from immigrants which has been increasing and they are used to a cash economy.

The housing market has many fundamental problems which are much bigger than student loan debt which will keep it depressed for the near future.

Constant vigilance!

The nice thing about week that, outside of housing, is rather light on data is that it lends itself to reviewing cross asset relationships that might otherwise get overlooked. A such, a few sellside analysts (myself included) have been whipping up some rather clever charts. Here’s a look at what I’ve been checking out since the weekend.

George Goncalves points to European risk premium as the driving force in the recent divergence between USTs and generally strong economic data. If Europe continues to muddle along this could force yields to more “normal” levels.

Continue reading

Bank of Internet – A Diamond in the Rough

I hate banks. I hate many if not most bank stocks, and I hate analyzing them even more, the reasons for which could be the topic of an entire post itself. That being said, I think I’ve found a bank stock that I don’t hate, but rather like, as I think it has the potential to post solid gains.
Continue reading

Newsflash: Chinese Co’s are Being Forced to Falsify Data

I wasn’t the first (nor second, nor anywhere near the first wave) of those warning about China investing, but over the past year+ I’ve tried to provide some healthy skepticism over many things that seem too good to be true (because they often are).

I just wrote a new post over at Forbes wherein I break down the problem, what the Chinese are doing about it, what they should be doing about it, and what investors/traders can do themselves.

Check it out here!

Why I’m not looking for a weak NFP number

After a blowout number last month, and one that did not exactly jibe with ADP many on the bearish side are expecting a lag on the BLS data will point to a rather weak number for the February employment situation. Here’s ADP v NFP since 2001.

As that chart shows NFP is actually great deal more noisy than ADP and what you can’t tell from that chart is that it’s much more prone to revisions.

This lead me to look into some other correlations (outside of tax receipts which factors heaviest into most sell side models) after kicking around a few things a rather obvious relationship stuck out. Over the past 35 years each time the 4 week moving average on initial claims broke under 375k then NFP trended above 250k. Here’s a chart of that relationship with claims inverted.

This points to rather strong job creation in the medium term which on a month to month basis should show up in strong readings. That said NFP as previously mentioned is a noisy metric. I would change my tune completely if ADP came in under 150, but for the time being I think it’s far better to position for strong data points on both readings.

Consumer Electronics: Don’t Believe the Hype

**This is a guest post from Lee Distad, an Edmonton, Alberta based custom channel business consultant. His freelance media work covers topics from CE to global business to finance in both print and online.**

I asked Lee to write a post on this topic given his extensive consumer electronics expertise. Neither he nor Stone Street Advisors has any position in the firms not mentioned in this article. I think this is an incredibly valuable perspective from an industry professional with considerable experience that many bulls and bears should take to heart.

–Jordan S. Terry

Don’t Believe The Hype

I’m just going to say it: Basing your investment decisions on press releases is a bad investment strategy. Yet some of the more vocal stock boosters point to press releases as validation for their position.
Nowhere was that more evident than last month on the comments section chatter on both technology and investing sites in the wake of CES.
Continue reading

My First Forbes Column – So What if Apple Has A Chinese Labor Problem?

Since I haven’t seen it anywhere else (not that it doesn’t exist), I’ve gone and estimated the impact of increased labor (wage and other) costs on Apple’s gross margins in the face of increased public attention on labor practices in China. I’d summarize it, but then I’d be doing you a disservice. Go check it out here!